Penerapan Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Materi Teladan Asmaul Husna Al-Malik dan Al-Aziz pada Siswa Kelas IV di SDN 074059 Onolimbu

Ainan Nur Lase

Abstract


Improving students' learning outcomes is a primary goal in education. However, the learning achievement of Islamic Religious Education (PAI) on the topic of Asmaul Husna, specifically Al-Malik and Al-Aziz, remains low at SDN 074059 Onolimbu. One contributing factor is the lack of active student engagement in learning methods. Discovery Learning, a student-centered approach, is believed to enhance understanding and learning outcomes. This method encourages students to explore concepts through problem-solving and hands-on experiences, facilitating deeper comprehension. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Discovery Learning in improving students' achievement in Asmaul Husna material in Grade IV at SDN 074059 Onolimbu. Using qualitative and quantitative approaches, this research measures learning improvement before and after implementing this method. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of more effective teaching strategies in Islamic Religious Education.


Keywords


Discovery Learning; Asmaul Husna; Islamic Religious Education; Learning Outcomes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2015). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The Act of Discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(2), 21-32.

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The Process of Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Harlen, W. (2006). Teaching, Learning and Assessing Science 5-12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Computers as Mindtools for Schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2000). Models of Teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.

Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should There Be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19.

Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York: Viking Press.

Sardiman, A. M. (2018). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono, M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprijono, A. (2014). Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Trianto. (2017). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Zubaidah, S. (2017). Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Kelas. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. awali Pers.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.62086/al-murabbi.v1i2.887

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.62086/al-murabbi.v1i2.887.g264

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.