Model Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Program Sarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
Abstract
Abstract
The bad quality of schooling in Indonesia is a well-established conversation. In any case, as of recently the issue of the nature of training is likewise wrapped up. Quality schooling is the assumption and request of all partners in training. Everybody will unquestionably really like to request science at an organization that has a decent quality. On this premise, schools/instructive organizations ought to have the option to offer great assistance and quality together not to be deserted and incapable of rivaling other instructive foundations. From different perspectives, rules, and markers that we can take that quality instruction could be improved assuming the school has one) support from the public authority, 2) Administration Chiefs compelling, 3) Execution great educators, 4) an important educational program 5) graduates quality, 6) culture and environment of viable association, 7) the help of the local area and guardians. Execution of the board in working on the nature of schooling is a genuine arrangement to be trusted to deal with the signs of the nature of training to make cooperative energy in endeavors to work on the nature of instruction.
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Education Quality Management
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdussamad, H Zuchri, and M Si Sik. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. CV. Syakir Media Press, 2021.
Afandi, Muhamad, Evi Chamalah, Oktarina Puspita Wardani, and H Gunarto. “Model Dan Metode Pembelajaran.” Semarang: Unissula, 2013.
Barell, John F. Problem-Based Learning: An Inquiry Approach. Corwin Press, 2006.
Barkley, Elizabeth F, Claire H Major, and K Patricia Cross. Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
Bhattacharyya, Dipak Kumar. Research Methodology. Excel Books India, 2009.
Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage publications, 2016.
Harahap, Nursapia. “Penelitian Kualitatif,” 2020.
Highet, Gilbert. “The Art of Teaching,” 1951.
Kearsley, Greg. “Online Education: Learning and Teaching in Cyberspace.” (No Title), 2000.
Kothari, Chakravanti Rajagopalachari. Research Methodology. new Age, 2004.
Learn, How People. “Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.” Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, 2000.
Maesaroh, Siti. “Peranan Metode Pembelajaran Terhadap Minat Dan Prestasi Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Jurnal Kependidikan 1, no. 1 (2013): 150–68.
Nasution, Mardiah Kalsum. “Penggunaan Metode Pembelajaran Dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa.” STUDIA DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Pendidikan 11, no. 01 (2017): 9–16.
Pandey, Prabhat, and Meenu Mishra Pandey. Research Methodology Tools and Techniques. Bridge Center, 2021.
Rajasekar, D, and Rajesh Verma. Research Methodology. Archers & Elevators Publishing House, 2013.
Salvin, R E. “Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice.” New York, 1990.
Silberman, Mel. Active Learning: 101 Strategies To Teach Any Subject. ERIC, 1996.
Stewart, Concetta M, Catherine C Schifter, and Melissa E Markaridian Selverian. Teaching and Learning with Technology: Beyond Constructivism. Routledge, 2010.
Stone-Wiske, Martha. Teaching for Understanding: Linking Research with Practice. Jossey-Bass, 1998.
Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. “Penelitian Kualitatif.” Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2003.
Ware, Colin. Visual Thinking for Design. Elsevier, 2010.
Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Vol. 5. sage, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62086/al-murabbi.v2i1.550
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.62086/al-murabbi.v2i1.550.g116
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aswar Harahap

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All works are licensed under CC BY-SA
Penerbit: Yayasan Al-Ahliyah Al-Islamiyah Aek Badak